Sunday, October 25, 2009

Facebook

Every few days I get an invitation to be someone's friend on Facebook -- if you are one of the people I've snubbed because I didn't want to spend the 8 seconds required to set up an account, please forgive me.

I would have continued to pretend like Facebook doesn't exist, but then I had a "that is so 21st century" moment. An acquaintance was due to have a baby and I was waiting and waiting to hear the baby had arrived. Finally, the baby is 8 weeks old and I meet her at a party. I said, "Why the hell did no one tell me you had the baby?!"

And everyone at the table shook their head in agreement when the new mother shrugged and said, "You need to be on Facebook."

And then my dearest friend, who used to send me long, fabulous, hilarious e-mails daily, apologized that I haven't heard from her for so long saying, "Well, if you were on Facebook..."

Alas, here I am! And I'm the only one without 439 friends, so please come and be my Facebook friend.

Labels:

Monday, September 07, 2009

Don't Blame Me, I'm Just Their Mother

When I saw this article on PETA's recent controversial campaign, I immediately thought of three things. First, I’ve met more than several chunky vegans. Second, my mother and I recently had a conversation wherein she explained to me that the reason she can’t lose weight is because she’s not willing to give up carbohydrates for the rest of her life. And when I asked why she has to give up carbohydrates, why she can’t just eat less in general, she looked at me as if I’d lost my mind and said she’s not sure.

Third I thought about how little I seem to be able to influence my children’s dietary preferences. The older my kids get the more I think parents are not to blame/thank for how kids turn out. I mean I know if you lock them in the shed for twenty years they probably won’t turn out too normal – of course. But beyond the basics, I’m certain that both of my children arrived here who they are and nothing (but nothing!) that I have done since can change that.

Recently Little One had to choose a meal he wanted to eat from some pictures in a workbook. The first meal was PB&J, a string cheese and some juice. “That’s just gross,” he said. “Jelly is gross, cheese is gross… I choose a salad, a chicken leg and a glass of milk.”

What self-respecting 6-year-old talks like this? And if you’re wondering if his propensity to follow the South Beach Diet is what has made him my Little One – well, we think so, but the doctor insists it’s genetics (we don’t know whose genetics, since his father is very tall and his mother is built like a linebacker, but anyway, who are we to argue with the doctor).

And the chicken leg thing? His dad and I can’t even watch him eat chicken. We use a fork and pull the meat off, remove the fat, gristle, skin, etcetera. He picks up the whole leg, like a medieval king, and eats it with his teeth until there’s just a clean, smooth bone left. Then again, he does his Midwestern-of-German-descent relatives proud – maybe these things skip a generation.

Lest you think I’ve had anything to do with it, his brother wouldn’t eat that meal unless bribed with seconds of mashed potatoes & gravy and ice cream for dessert.

They have heard a lot about nutrition during their short lives. “They’re not bodybuilders – they’re toddlers,” I had to argue with their athletic father on more than several occasions. “They need carbohydrates for proper brain and muscle development.”

And while it's true that J likes to eat more similar to me and Little One, their dad – neither of them really choose to eat like we’ve taught them. I was alone with them and suggested we go out for pizza. J was all over it. Little One screeched, “I haaaate pizza! Just take me home so Daddy can cook me some meat.”

But even better than meat, for Little One, is fruit. When J was a year old, I was reading Dr. Sears’ advice for feeding toddlers and my husband scoffed, “Why does he have to eat so much fruit? I can’t even eat that much fruit – and I outweigh him by 200 pounds!” Today J eats plenty of fruit… you know, when he has to in order to get seconds of mac & cheese or dessert.

Their dad and I do agree on many nutrition principles and are both disgusted with what passes for “lunch” at our kids’ school. When J started first grade, he would tell me things like he had a corn dog and apple juice for lunch. Then I learned that there’s an optional salad/fruit bar (whose idiotic idea was it to make that optional?). So I told him that from now on I expect him to choose something from there, anything he likes, an apple, some carrots, whatever. Just something.

The next day I asked what he chose from the salad bar and he said, “Pudding.”

Dessert is at the salad bar too – of course! How could I not have known? So that backfired, as good-parenting attempts often do.

Little One starts first grade tomorrow and I’m going to have to forbid him from going to the salad bar or he won’t eat anything for lunch that has calories. The other day he was riding in the cart at the grocery store and he begged for clementines, then grapes, then blueberries… Finally he screamed, “Oh watermelon! Can we pleeeeeease get some watermelon!”

I listed all the fruits we had in the cart and already at home and said, “We don’t need any watermelon.”

And as I was squeezing the avocadoes he looked at the pasta, rice, beer, butter, cheese and crackers in the cart and said to no one in particular, “Well – we don’t need ANY of this shit.”

So maybe parents have a teensy bit of influence – I am sure I have no control over his dietary preferences, but I admit that I might know where he gets that mouth.

Labels: ,

Saturday, August 08, 2009

Natural Great Perfection

My review of the book, Natural Great Perfection: Dzogchen Teachings and Vajra Songs by Nyoshul Khenpo & Lama Surya Das is now posted on Feminist Review. You can read it here.

There are some things this book reminds me of that don't fit in the review, like a bumper sticker I saw the other day that said, "Honk if you don't exist." (Which further reminds me of the brilliant Monty Python skit where Nietzsche was thrown out of a soccer game for telling the umpire that he didn't exist...)

But the most fun aspect of reading this book has been the juxtaposition of it with an experience I've been having at work. I've always believed that sanity is somewhat cultural and subjective, or that, at the very least, it exists on a continuum -- that everybody is a little bit nutty in some way or another. Or as a friend of mine always says, "everyone's normal until you get to know them." But lately I've really been contemplating the fine line between a little out there and like really far gone.

So I have this customer and the first time I talked to him he told me that he knew he needed to get himself "right" because the trees wouldn't talk to him.

Now, most likely, you exist somewhere on the normal/crazy continuum that makes you think, "Wow, that dude is totally nuts."

But not me -- I totally get that, from where I sit on the spectrum. So we had a nice little conversation about talking to trees, the universe and such - he thanked me for understanding and then paid me the highest compliment I've received to date -- he said I'm the Buddha-Master. (Which I'm not, but still... it's a very kind thing for someone to say about you and I appreciate it.)

Time passed... our connection grew... but then it happened. He said that he'd let his robot guard down for thirty seconds and the robots got him. And I suddenly realized that I'm not talking to a crazy person like me, I'm talking to a person who struggles to grasp reality. I mean talking trees - a literary theme as old as story-telling -- everybody knows that trees laugh, whisper, etcetera! As American as burning witches at the stake. But robots? That's just looney talk.

So I asked myself, what would the Buddha-Master do when talking to this person (who is me, of course, if I am in fact the Buddha-Master)?

Alas, my book, Natural Great Perfection, doesn't contain the answer -- or maybe it does: "When one realizes the natural state, the true nature of all beings, there is naturally a welling up of inconceivable spontaneous compassion, loving-kindness, consideration, and empathy, because one realizes there is no self separate from others. One then treats others just like oneself. There is no cause for aversion, attachment or exploitation."

A very fine answer, indeed - wish me luck applying it.

z

Labels: , ,

Sunday, August 02, 2009

On Mommy Blogging

July is like the month of new beginnings to end all months of new beginnings for me. Both of my kids were born in July. We got our dog in July. And this blog was born in July -- four (!!!!) years ago. Many times I've thought I'd just scrap it, but then --- well, there are four years of musings, stories, rants and assorted nonsense collected here, and like any narcissist worth her (organic) salt, I'm kind of attached to them (even as they're simultaneously embarrassing to read). Even though I've lost more than half the readers I used to have, I continue to update this space every now and then (mostly when BlogHer tells me I have to, but I'm trying to do better than that).

So I'll be honest, since honesty is what we love best about mommy blogs --- I started this blog because I needed something to do, I wanted to improve my writing skills, and after being home alone with babies/toddlers/preschoolers for four years, I desperately needed some adult "voices." Plus, I thought there was a chance I might be a kind-of funny writer and maybe Woody Allen would discover me or something... (which hasn't happened, if you were wondering). But over time my situation changed (a few times) and the fact is, I don't find my life to be all that humorous anymore -- so I'm often short on things to write about. Though I did, for the first time this birthday, really struggle and feel sadness around my kids getting older and I do have more essays in me somewhere (I'm pretty sure).

I mean I still have comical moments, like the night J (now 8) and Little One (now 6 and as little as ever) explained to me why they don't believe in God or the devil (that devil thing is pure crazy talk evidently) but they do believe in Jesus. Or how J said his friend told him not to ask questions about the Buddha because it's bad luck (there's a kid after my own heart!). Or the day J announced out loud in the grocery store that I drink a lot of wine (to many people, though no one in particular), forcing me to decide, on the fly, if it's more pathetic to be seen by the general public as someone who drinks too much or someone who argues with her kid in the produce section about how much she doesn't drink. And then there's the day that Little One learned (while discussing chickens, of all things) that the difference between him and girls is a specific appendage (and lack thereof). Several hours later, he approached me at the dryer, narrowed his eyes at me suspiciously and in a semi-aggressive manner said, "Mama, show me that part of you where there would be a penis if you had one."

Bring them up right -- that's my motto.

But seriously, for the most part, my life today does not in any way resemble my life when I started this blog -- and I do think it's kind of cool that the evolution is documented and also that I have some great stories that I won't be able to forget. But what that means for the future, I'm just not sure. Rather than complain that my life is busy, I'm trying to be grateful that my life is abundant -- and when I have a little bit of time to enjoy my children, I haven't wanted to squander it creating stories about them, leaving myself doomed to only being able to appreciate life in retrospect.

Still, this is not a Dear John letter and I do appreciate so many of you who have stuck around through my blogging marathon stages as well as my private and public blog ambivalence syndrome. I'm still trying to figure out what I might do with this space going forward, but I suspect I'll be here in some capacity or another.

Labels: , , ,

Friday, June 26, 2009

Just for Laughs

Yes We Can (laugh) courtesy of The Onion:


"Obama Revises Campaign Promise Of 'Change' To
'Relatively Minor Readjustments In Certain Favorable Policy
Areas'
"

Read the whole (short) piece here.

z

Labels: ,

Saturday, June 20, 2009

In Retrospect, I Should Have Been a Buddhist Nun

My latest go-to stress-relieving fantasy is that I’m a Buddhist nun. Living quietly with everything I need. But then I remember that for a variety of reasons I wouldn’t make a very good Buddhist - or any flavor of nun for that matter. Like being a Buddhist and being a pacifist sort of goes hand-in-hand and I’m not a pacifist. You’re probably surprised to hear that the way I criticize war, but I’m only opposed to the aggressor in imperialistic wars (the most common aggressor in my lifetime having been my government). Still, as much as I feel peaceful just looking at the Dalai Lama, I can’t help wondering that if he hadn’t been such a pussy, maybe the Tibetans wouldn’t have entirely lost their homes to the Chinese army. On the other hand, there’s a chance they’d all be dead instead of just exiled, but peace without justice is no peace at all and from where I sit, there’s not a whole lot of justice happening on this planet. So I’m a warrior, therefore not a very good Buddhist nun.

However, the real reason I’ve been obsessed with becoming a nun is a more personal and complicated story and not the kind of thing I generally share on this blog, but I’ve run out of topics so here goes:

A couple of years ago, I remembered that I had forgotten to go to graduate school, right about the time I had the temporarily devastating realization that my life is half over and so if I have things I mean to do “someday,” someday has arrived. So I applied to a Master’s Program and was rejected. I felt entirely destroyed, like there was nothing else I ever possibly wanted to do but that. Then after a while I got over it (I’m good at that, if nothing else) and applied to two more programs last fall. (I also opened a coffee shop, which is really fun but isn’t making any money yet.) When I applied I thought that I probably wouldn’t get accepted to either one, since I’m obviously such a loser I couldn’t get into the first one I applied to, right? But my thinking was, I will have tried -- and then being a good religious girl (or bad religious girl, whichever) I would accept that God has spoken and it’s just not meant to be in this lifetime.

So now, after living frugally and simply for all of my adulthood, just like the vast majority of regular people who are now being blamed for the financial crisis we’re in as a nation, I’m routinely calculating how long we might get to keep living here if I stopped paying the mortgage, weighing if I’d benefit more from not paying my credit cards (used to open the coffee shop) or from maintaining perfect credit at any cost -- basically living an eighth of a nickel away from debtors prison and working as hard as I can to make money fast enough.

Then what happens? I’ve been accepted to both graduate programs. And I really want to do them both. Because if not now, then when?

What I need is a miracle – and as luck would have it, I believe in miracles. So I’m waiting – breathing in the fear, breathing out relaxation – comforted by my relentless faith in the abundance of the universe and that all things, good and bad, come to an end. Maybe I could have pulled off being a nun after all.